01
Leader or responsible?
David Noguera Hancock,
Humanitarian worker,
president of Doctors Without Borders
in Spain (from 2016 to 2021)
The emotional inaugural speech of United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres at the General Assembly reflected his impotence and frustration in the face of the challenges of the world around us. Uncontrolled wars, climate change, artificial intelligence… existential threats that are present today. His audience was the world, but in the room, he was surrounded by what we call “world leaders”.
I greatly appreciate the invitation from the Chair of Leadership in Values to write this text. But I ask you for one thing in return. As a chair, I would entrust you with the task of redefining what a world leader is. To tidy up the lexicon so that we are clear about what and who we are talking about.
Because leadership, a concept loaded with positive connotations, either has a favorable impact on the population, or it is not leadership. We must identify it in another way. And if we called them responsible? From the balcony of the memory of my 25 years dedicated to humanitarian action, I know firsthand what the failure that Guterres somehow expressed is.
Because there is no better example of collective failure than an armed conflict, a famine that kills dozens of children, or an uncontrolled epidemic. When you lead an emergency response project, where you always work overwhelmed by the context and operate triage medicine (choosing who you save and who you don’t), you must be very clear about where the limits and differences between leadership and responsibility are.
We live in a world that has all the capabilities to solve its fundamental problems and decides every day not to do so. Moreover, we live in a world where there are already people/individuals who can change everything, and who decide every day that they will not. Because there are those responsible for these existential threats. With names and surnames, at the head of governments and other entities, who enjoy this label of leader.
And it is essential to distinguish between popularity and prestige. They are popular, but no one is able to identify the Mandela of our generation, impossible to find among a new generation of rulers who, yes, have won their particular “Squid Game” in which they have turned contemporary politics in their respective countries and institutions, at the cost of their prestige among the population. This is not leadership.
And it is essential to distinguish between profit and well-being, and between performance and utility. There are individuals who can accumulate profits and wealth to obscene limits, but are absolutely useless in generating balances that ensure the well-being and dignity of the population around them. This is not leadership either.
And let no one confuse this text with anti-politics. On the contrary. Because the alternative is very real. I remember firsthand the tough moments of COVID in Catalonia, where all the forms of leadership that we need to identify, enhance, and recognize emerged. Among the rulers, healthcare workers, and other services, and a committed and responsible citizenry, there were thousands of examples of solidarity and empathy that defeated the greatest threat of our generation. And it is true that we had some examples of greed, incompetence, and excessive selfishness. But it is undeniable that collectively we overcame that challenge. True politics was made.
Therefore, the ability to solve major challenges and problems is not about capacity. It is about will. It is not that it cannot be done. It is that it is not wanted. It is not a question of leadership then. It is a question of responsibility.
Therefore, those responsible are those who make us worse, hoping that somehow and someday they will have to be held accountable and we will strip from their immense ego that satisfaction when they hear themselves called a leader.
And let us reserve this last word (leader) for so many people who make decisions seeking balances between interests and principles, between the individual and the common, and in a very human way, in the sense that they do it full of contradictions, full of doubts, without having all the answers, achieving good things without ever being perfect. And they try from the position they have reached or have been given in life, contributing not only to the well-being of their own (perfectly legitimate), but also trying to respond to collective challenges, seeking an impact that transcends what is strictly popular or profitable, and with a view that also seeks the well-being of people, and particularly protects the less favored.
And by doing this, they set an example every day.
David Noguera Hancock
humanitarian worker,
president of Doctors Without Borders
in Spain (from 2016 to 2021)
02
Talk between Manel Estiarte and Ramon Besa
Manel Estiarte and Ramon Besa talk about leadership and communication.
“Words that foster wills”
Manel Estiarte
Former water polo player and member of Pep Guardiola’s coaching staff at Manchester City. He has been an Olympian on several occasions and was part of the International Olympic Committee. He received the Prince of Asturias Award for sports in 2001 for his exemplary sports career.
“We want them perfect. We want the leader to be a single person. Let’s leave that aside. The leader must be an imperfect person, who shows their limitations, with their abilities, who knows how to surround themselves with good people.
[…] The most important thing of all is that [the leader] has a good understanding of the human being: that they know how to harness [the person’s] talent to put it at the service of the group.”
03
David Noguera recommends...
David Noguera,
Humanitarian worker,
president of Doctors Without Borders
in Spain (from 2016 to 2021)
04
Magic Maze
Recommended by
CAE, formació i serveis socioculturals